Civil Society Initiative

Civil Society Initiative

Devoted to the theory and practice of responsible democratic citizenship

The Civil Society Initiative at Washington University in St. Louis promotes responsible democratic citizenship — which crucially includes the ability to reason about value questions and to engage with moral and political disagreement — by supporting research, teaching, and public engagement.  Universities have traditionally sought to educate their students for citizenship, but this mission is frustrated by skepticism about reasonable pluralism and by threats to academic freedom and free speech.  Our project seeks to train members of our community to think rigorously about value questions and to create spaces for free and open political debate, as a complement to political action and civic engagement.  We aim both to understand the nature of responsible democratic citizenship by asking theoretical questions in political theory, social epistemology, and moral psychology and to support the practices of responsible democratic citizenship in our community.  

For more information or to join our mailing list, contact the Director of the Civil Society Initiative, Allan Hazlett.

The Civil Society Initiative is a collaboration of the Departments of Philosophy and Political Science and is supported by the Frick Initiative and the Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy.

Latest News

Lowering the Temperature on Hot Topics

Ben Ewer and Kate Farmer are interviewed about our Dinner & Dialogue series

Read The Article

Cultivating Disagreement Grants

We are seeking proposals from WashU faculty for curricular development projects that create new courses, course modules, and/or course materials that aim to cultivate disagreement in the classroom and beyond.

Learn More

Can We Get Better At Disagreeing?

The Civil Society Initiative was recently profiled for an article in The Source.

Read the article

From Aristotle to AI

The Civil Society Initiative's summer course for high school students is profiled in The Source.

Read the Article

Events

Our events model reasonable disagreement and provide access to the latest research in political theory, social epistemology, and moral psychology.

Events

Courses

Free Speech from Spinoza to Trump

This course provides an introduction to the philosophical and legal history of free speech and a survey of contemporary issues, including hate speech, pornography, social media moderation, and protest rights.  We consider the principle of freedom of expression both as a restriction on state power and as restriction on non-state actors, such as universities and activist groups, and ask what the proper scope of free speech ought to be.

Next offered in Spring 2026 (as Philosophy 3320)

How to Disagree: Informal Logic and Argumentation (Philosophy 1020)

Disagreement with other people is a ubiquitous feature of our lives: we encounter disagreements in politics, in business, in academic contexts, and in our personal lives.  Disagreement is also completely normal: we should expect to disagree with our friends, our colleagues, our co-workers, and our fellow citizens.  Students in this course will develop skills and learn strategies for representing arguments, charitable interpretation, analysis and criticism, identifying common fallacies, locating sources of disagreement, and having more constructive and respectful debates.

Next offered in Fall 2026

Disagreement, Extremism, and Polarization (Philosophy 2201)

This course introduces students to questions about whether it is possible for reasonable people to disagree, whether democratic deliberation requires a background of agreement or “shared facts,” how our moral psychology shapes our political beliefs, whether prejudice and bias can be eliminated from political thinking, and whether there are some political positions that are so extreme they should not be taken seriously.  We survey research in a range of disciplines, including philosophy, political science, psychology, and sociology.  

Next offered in Spring 2027

Social Identity and Democratic Deliberation (Philosophy 2202)

This course  investigates how core deliberative practices, including argument and testimony, are distorted by individuals’ social identities.  How should argument and testimony work in a democracy? How does social identity, including gender, race and class, impact us as political agents within a deliberative context?  Is someone's social identity relevant to the credibility of their moral and political claims?  We survey these issues through an examination of contemporary research in democratic theory and social epistemology.

Our Team

Allan  Hazlett

Allan Hazlett

Professor of Philosophy

Allan Hazlett works on testimony, skepticism, desire, the value of truth, reasons, and other topics in epistemology and metaethics. 

Anne Baril

Anne Baril

Senior Lecturer in Philosophy

Anne Baril has research interests in ethics, epistemology, and their intersection. She is especially interested in the role of epistemic virtues and values in the good life.

Photo of Ron Mallon

​Ron Mallon

Professor of Philosophy and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology

314-935-7149

Professor Mallon's current research interests include social constructionist claims and the role that culturally transmitted moral rules play in moral reasoning.​